Wolf Moon Journal Art, Movies, Independant, Essay, Opinion logo
















LETTERS FROM BOBOLINK FARM
By Barbara Tatham Johnson

 


IT’S NOT EASY BEING A MUSE

SIGHT UNSEEN

Directed by Jeri Pitcher; written by Donald Margulies; scenic design by Justin Elie; costumes designed by Kati Mulcahy
With: Mike Anthony, Sally Wood, R. Chris Reeder, and Jessica Pohly
At the Theater at Monmouth in Monmouth, Maine
Performed on July 21 and August 14, 2007

Reviewed by Laurie Meunier Graves

In ancient Greece, the muses were nine goddesses whose job was to inspire artists, and each goddess presided over a specific art form: comedy, tragedy, lyric poetry, love poetry, dance, epic poetry, astronomy, sacred poetry, and history. How else to explain the will-o’-the-wisp nature of artistic inspiration and talent as well as the magic that seems to accompany making a work of art? Surely art must be divinely inspired, mixed with a strong dose of Eros to keep the artist energized. As with many concepts, the idea of the muse has changed over time, variously influenced by Christianity, secularism, and feminism. In The Lives of the Muse: Nine Women and the Artists They Inspired, Francine Prose observes “that every historical period re-creates the muse in its own image. Each era endows the muse with qualities, virtues, and flaws that the epoch and its artists need…” Nowadays, muses are not considered divine but rather all too human. Most of the time, the muse is female, and the artist is male, which makes feminism raise a questioning, “ironic” eyebrow. Prose goes on to write that the male artist is not terribly concerned with “the challenge of staying fascinating or attractive” to his female muse. Instead, he is preoccupied by his own feelings, and “the muses are merely the instruments that…churn up the weather in a way that may speed and facilitate [his] labors.”

It’s a job that most sensible women would shun the way a cat shuns water, but, Patricia, in the play Sight Unseen, is not a sensible woman, at least not in her younger days. She’s vivacious, romantic, impulsive, and enthusiastic, ready to live deeply and passionately and perhaps unwisely. Patricia, a nude model at an art college in New York, becomes intensely attracted to Jonathan, one of the student artists, and with a few fits and starts, he reluctantly acknowledges his attraction to her. He is Jewish, and she is not, which means his mother will not approve.

But I’m getting ahead of things because in fact the play begins in “a cold farmhouse in Norfolk, England,” in 1985, seventeen years after Patricia and Jonathan met in art college. Jonathan has become a famous artist, with a big show opening in London, and Patricia has become a poor, bitter archeologist who digs through rubbish all day. She has married Nick, also an archeologist, and it doesn’t take long for the audience to realize that Patricia has “settled for less” and is deeply unhappy. Jonathan, who hasn’t seen Patricia since they parted ways, has called, and for reasons that become clear later in the play, he has asked to come visit while he’s in England. Against her better judgement, Patricia agrees, and the play opens with Jonathan’s arrival. Jonathan meets Nick, who clearly loathes him, and his reunion with Patricia isn’t much better. We can’t help but wonder: How did Jonathan and Patricia ever connect? By jumping back and forth in time and by ending at the beginning, the play shows us exactly how it happened, and the audience comes to sympathize with both of them.

Even though it might take a while, most people eventually get over a failed love affair, but Patricia is not one of those people. Her lively nature belies a fragility that will not allow her to “get over it.” As it turned out, Patricia was once Jonathan’s muse, and it was a job she loved. The two years she spent with Jonathan were the best two years of her life, and the rest has been dull and gray in comparison. Although quite likely it wouldn’t have mattered, no one ever told her that muses are often ruthlessly dumped as soon as they stop providing inspiration.

At this point, it would be easy to take a keen dislike to the self-centered Jonathan, whose sense of artistic entitlement is astonishing. Jonathan takes, and like most muses, Patricia gives, even though the price might be too high. But then it comes out that Jonathan has his own issues, and they are not insignificant. In his biography of the philosopher Isaiah Berlin, Michael Ignatieff describes how Berlin had to braid being Russian, English, and Jewish—a reconciliation of opposites, to say the least— into “the single skein of his identity. ” Jonathan has a similar task, but in his case the skein comprises being American, Jewish, and an artist. Those of us who have faced such a task know how daunting and difficult it is and how it might take a lifetime to achieve. Jonathan, after all, is barely into middle age, and we can forgive him, even if Patricia cannot.

For Sight Unseen to work, the fast-paced dialogue must be snappy, and the two actors who play Patricia and Jonathan must reach a precarious balance of desperation, self-centeredness, spark, and vulnerability. In the Theater of Monmouth’s fine production of this intense, complex play, Sally Wood and Mike Anthony, who respectively portray Patricia and Jonathan, achieve that very balance. Wood’s Patricia is brittle and unhappy, a woman on the edge, and when Jonathan makes his final, selfish demand, Wood’s response is heartbreaking but not overdone. With exquisite timing and responses, Anthony’s Jonathan is by turns open-faced and smug, an artist with the self-assurance of having a waiting list of patrons who are willing to buy “sight unseen” his yet-to-be-finished work. Yet Anthony shows how Jonathan is also on the edge, even though he should be at the height of his powers. His father’s death has left him adrift, and he can no longer find the artistic inspiration that he once had.

Also very good is R. Chris Reeder, as Patricia’s soft-spoken but far from self-effacing husband. In his own way, he is as controlling as Jonathan, and poor Patricia is caught between the two. Finally, there is Jessica Pohly, who does an excellent job with the bright but arrogant Grete, a German journalist who interviews Jonathan at an art gallery in London. The tension between the journalist and the artist ricochets between humor and drama, but by the end of the interview, nobody is laughing. All the actors come together under the bright, capable direction of Jeri Pitcher, who is fast becoming one of the best directors in Maine.

The Theater at Monmouth’s Sight Unseen illustrates just how good modern theater can be when everything is in place. I only wish the theater could offer a fall, spring, or winter season where such smaller plays would be offered. Not to replace the summer season, of course, but to augment it. But, there. I am grateful for what I have, and it is probably greedy to wish for more. Still, a theater lover can wish…

 


 

The current Journal in print is
Winter

2008 Wolf Moon Desk Calendar

We are pleased to  announce that we have put together another snappy desk calendar featuring work by Maine photographer Clif Graves.

5 1/2" x 5" 2008 Wolf Moon Calendar just $10.00 each
More Info

Some of the fine stores
where you can find
Wolf Moon JOURNAL

More Info

Wolf Moon
Photo Note Cards



More Info

 


© Wolf Moon Press 2002-2007 all rights reserved.


Submission Guidelines