|
| |
A BANG-UP ENDING TO THE BEGINNING OF STAR
WARS
STAR WARS: REVENGE OF THE SITH
Directed and written by George Lucas; music by John Williams; cinematography
by David Tattersall; edited by Roger Barton and Ben Burtt; casting by
Christine King; production design by Gavin Bocquet; art direction by Ian
Gracie, Phil Harvey, David Lee, and Peter Russell; set decoration by Richard
Roberts; costume design by Trisha Biggar
With: Ewan McGregor, Hayden Christensen, Natalie Portman, Ian McDiarmid,
Samuel L. Jackson, Jimmy Smits, Frank Oz, Anthony Daniels, Kenny Baker, and
Christopher Lee. Rated PG-13: Rated PG-13 for sci-fi violence and some
intense images. Runtime: 140 minutes
  
Reviewed by Joel Johnson
The Star Wars saga has been completed with the release of Star
Wars III: Revenge of the Sith. It has already created a tidal wave at
the box office. This isn’t anything new for a Star Wars movie.
However, unlike the tepid and disappointing critical and audience reactions
to its two immediate predecessors, Star Wars I: The Phantom Menace and
Star Wars II: Attack of the Clones, this final film is being widely
praised. It successfully delivers both thrilling adventure and a dark
complex story showing the metamorphosis of the boy Anakin Skywalker into the
evil Darth Vader. It is certainly deserving of praise. The writing is more
interesting despite abundant prosaic dialogue. And the acting is much
better. It is still full of lightsaber duels, starfighter dogfights, and
derring-do. The future envisioned by Lucas has demanded imagination from the
set and costume designers responsible for the look of the film. They
delivered visual splendor, and an army of CGI effect specialists have worked
hard to create the spectacles beyond the grasp of mere physical artistry.
But here the effects serve the story instead of just being eye candy
designed to awe the audience. Ewan McGregor takes center stage as Obi-Wan
Kenobi, delivering his best Star Wars performance. The diminutive
Jedi master Yoda (voiced by Frank Oz) turns in his most affecting
performance. Samuel L. Jackson, Hayden Christiansen, and Natalie Portman
have saved their best Star Wars acting for the final film. They are still
somewhat stiffer than in most of their non–Star Wars gigs, but they
definitely have regained human form. All that was missing was the marionette
strings from their dreadfully Pinocchio-esque performances in I and II. Ian
McDiarmid continues to shine as the duplicitous Supreme Chancellor Palpatine,
also known by his Sith name Darth Sidious. McDiarmid has had the most
faceted character to portray and has easily been the most compelling
character of the last three Star Wars films. Perhaps even the last
four, since we were introduced to his character in what is now Star Wars
VI: Return of the Jedi.
This, of course, brings us to the rather odd storytelling process for the
entire Star Wars saga. In my childhood, one could go into the theater
anytime and stay as long as one wanted. This meant one could start watching
a film in the middle and then stay for the next showing to see what had been
missed from the first half. This is exactly what George Lucas has done for
us. We have seen the end of the story in Jedi, and now we have seen
the end of the beginning in Sith. This is a rather discomfiting place
to be left—with evil ascendant. This is complicated by the significant
passage of time. The last half of the story was released in 1977, 1980, and
1983. The first half of the story came out in 1999, 2002, and 2005. A
generation came of age between the time the earlier set (VI, V, and VI) was
made and the time the second set (I, II, and III) was done. The special
effects, particularly the computer-generated imagery (CGI), have probably
gone through countless generations between 1977 and 2005. Can we evaluate
all six movies fairly? Does memory play tricks on us in recalling the
earlier films and remembering how we felt about them way back when? How much
have fans of the earlier films changed over the intervening years? Lucas
has, however, crafted the ideal DVD film set—at least from a marketing point
of view. Fans who have seen the films in the order of their release will now
have the opportunity to see them in Lucas’s numeric order. It will be
interesting how the six-part story holds up. McDiarmid’s Darth Sidious looks
grotesquely ancient at the conclusion of Sith, but was actually just
thirty-nine when he first played the part in Jedi. The time frame for
Jedi is supposed to be enough years later to allow the infants Luke
and Leia born in Sith to grow up to be adults. Lucas, much to the chagrin of
the original fans of the series, made The Phantom Menace a simple
film with a child protagonist, assuring a new generation of fans joining
their elders. There’s almost assuredly a DVD boxed set that Star Wars
fans young and old will absolutely have to own. Lucas may not be the
greatest filmmaker, but no one can accuse him of missing very many good
business opportunities. Just like everyone else, I am looking forward to
checking out how the six films fare in their new order. My favorite from the
earlier films was the second film, now designated Star Wars V: The Empire
Strikes Back.
Perhaps one of the more disturbing developments over the years has been the
increasing politicization of nearly everything. The public square has become
a battleground between blue staters and red staters over a myriad of
issues—from stem cell research, legalized abortion, health care, poverty,
Social Security funding, encouraging democracy, dealing with terrorism, and
fighting the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The vitriolic content in our
national political discourse has reached levels that are truly alarming. It
often seems that no issue is evaluated on its own merits but is always in
relationship to some other pet cause. On top of that, all manner of artistic
endeavors are being scrutinized for some undertone of a political statement.
Some have tried to see parallels between the story in this most recent
Star Wars movie and our current political situation. Some have
castigated Revenge of the Sith as a film with a deliberately
insidious anti–President Bush message. Several quotations have been taken as
exhibits to buttress this argument. I can’t reach into George Lucas’s mind
to determine what he intended, but he has been working on the overall shape
of this story for about three decades or so. This would be well before the
president’s ascendancy to the White House following the 2000 election. Much
of the story seems to draw upon ancient Rome with its Republic that morphed
into the Roman Empire. I suspect that his dialogue references to absolute
values and defining those not actively on one’s side as enemies reflect his
perception of the underpinnings of tyranny. Instead of trying to find how
George Lucas is casting aspersions on President Bush, the film-going public
would be better served to see how the present political situation fits into
an archetypal story of good and evil.
Regardless of one’s political loyalties, the film can and should be enjoyed
simply as the adventure yarn that it is, just like its now sequel—renamed
from Star Wars to Star Wars IV: A New Hope—was when it was first
released in 1977. It did not intend to do anything much more than to
entertain and excite its audience. It has become one of the most successful
film franchises of all time. One can argue that attempting to make it into a
grandiose epic of good and evil has challenged its capacity to simply
entertain its audience. However, despite these pitfalls it will continue to
amuse, thrill, and inspire. Its audience will continue to grow—first through
DVD. Although Lucas himself has indicated that he will not make any further
Star Wars films, he does plan two Star Wars television series.
That should keep fans’ appetites whetted for the full-bore spectacle that
only a theatrical film version can deliver. It took sixteen years for I, II,
and III to get started, so I wouldn’t totally rule out a further series of
films. “Never” may not be the last word either for Lucas or someone
interested in assuming his mantle. It will be interesting to see whether or
not there is an heir to George Lucas and who that might be.

|
| |
| |
|
|
|
2008 Wolf Moon Desk Calendar
We are pleased to announce that we have put together another snappy desk calendar
featuring work by Maine photographer Clif Graves.

5 1/2" x 5"
2008 Wolf Moon Calendar just
$10.00 each
More Info |
|
Some of the fine
stores
where you can find
Wolf Moon JOURNAL
More Info |
|
Wolf Moon
Photo Note Cards

More Info
|
|
|
|