|
| |
FIVE MOVIE REVIEWS
ART SCHOOL CONFIDENTIAL
L’INTRUS (THE INTRUDER)
C.S.A: THE CONFEDERATE STATES OF AMERICA
FRIENDS WITH MONEY
THANK YOU FOR SMOKING
By Joel Johnson
ART SCHOOL CONFIDENTIAL
Directed by Terry Zwigoff; written by Daniel Clowes, based on his short
comic story; director of photography, Jamie Anderson; edited by Robert
Hoffman; music by David Kitay
With: Max Minghella, Sophia Myles, John Malkovich, Jim Broadbent, Matt
Keeslar, Ethan Suplee, Joel David Moore, Nick Swardson, and Anjelica Huston.
Rated R. Running time: 102 minutes
  
Director Terry Zwigoff burst onto the cinema scene with Crumb (1994)
establishing himself as a unique voice with the story of eccentric
cartoonist Robert Crumb. He has since turned from documentary to fictional
films but has continued to focus on unconventional characters. In Art
School Confidential, Zwigoff and his screenwriting collaborator Daniel
Clowes decide to mine the comic potential of an entire art school with its
assorted oddball students and faculty. They start with Max Minghella (Yes,
Anthony’s son) as the freshman Jerome who aspires to be the best artist in
the world and then add a serial murder subplot, a beautiful model (Sophia
Myles) with whom Jerome has fallen in love, a super clean-cut rival Jonah
(Matt Keeslar), and a quartet of established major stars (John Malkovich,
Jim Broadbent, Anjelica Huston, and an uncredited Steve Buscemi). The result
is a highly anticipated arthouse film with potential to burst out of this
niche market to appeal to a broader audience. Alas, this film is better on
paper than it is onscreen. Not that it is bad. It will sustain audience
interest throughout and will intermittently be extremely funny. The film,
however, lacks the kind of narrative flow that makes each scene feels like
an integral part of a complete story. Art School Confidential plays
like a series of improvised sketches that have been strung together. Some of
the sketches work exceedingly well and others less well, but the narrative
thread ends up quite frayed in the process. It doesn’t help that the film
not only relies on caricatures of art school student stereotypes but then
has perennial student Bardo (Joel David Moore) point these out to Jerome and
to us. This is telling the audience about the story and not showing the
audience the story. Telling—as opposed to showing—usually fails to connect
with the audience (audiences for The Intruder [see following review]
may belie that). All in all, you could spend 102 minutes with much worse
films.
L’INTRUS (THE INTRUDER)
Written and directed by Claire Denis; director of photography, Agnès Godard;
edited by Nelly Quettier; music by Stuart Staples
With: Michel Subor, Béatrice Dalle, Grégoire Colin, Florence Loiret-Caille,
Katia Golubeva, and Bambou. This movie is unrated. Running time: 130 minutes
  ½
This Claire Denis film lends itself to one of my pet expressions because “it
puts the foreign back in foreign films.” This is not because it is bad or
should be avoided, but audiences will need a high level of patience in
dealing with its ambiguity and its dark themes. L’intrus is a
quintessential “critics’ film” that enthralls critics while filmgoers who
prefer linear narratives will be left bewildered and ill tempered. The film
owes its genesis to Jean-Luc Nancy’s novel of his own heart transplant, but
this just provides a jumping-off point. Although a foreign-language film,
audiences should not feel overwhelmed by subtitles and may, in fact, yearn
for more verbal exposition. L’intrus almost exclusively relies on
visual imagery to convey its story. Cinematographer Agnès Godard’s imagery
is by turns beautiful, poignant, intriguing, banal, and shocking.
Early on we are introduced to Louis Trebor (Michel Subor), a mysterious
recluse with only a pair of dogs as companions living in the Jura Mountains
on the border between France and Switzerland. Louis is a rugged athletic man
in his sixties or early seventies, and we quickly learn that he has a bad
heart. Yet this isn’t simply a matter of its deficiency in maintaining the
body’s lifeblood. It is as if this were only a physical manifestation of a
deeper ill. Yet he desperately wants to live and tells a shadowy young
Russian woman (Katia Golubeva) that he wants a vigorous young man’s heart,
not one from an old man or a woman. Louis hastily leaves his sylvan
paradise, abandoning his dogs and the strained relationship with his son (Grégoire
Colin) that has withered from neglect. The mountain man dons a coat and tie,
retrieves a huge stash of unexplained money from a safe deposit box, and
shops for a watch. He exchanges his natural environment for one totally
man-made with concrete and steel. He then gets on a plane. Yet the film
returns to the Jura with even more suddenness. Though the pristine images
betray no altered reality, there is something dreamlike about these
segments—perhaps because they become nightmares. Louis is being dragged over
the snow on a sled by two riders mounted on horses when they decide to leave
him in the middle of nowhere. The beautiful “wild woman” (Lolita Chammah)
breaks into Louis’s abandoned cabin only to have her sensuous, stolen idyll
come to a gruesome end. Louis finally has his transplant. The film’s press
kit says this happened in Korea, but the film does little to make this clear
to the audience. It is, however, much clearer about Louis’s post-surgery
destination—Tahiti. Louis has visited here before—and Denis intersplices
grainy clips of a young Michel Subor from the 1965 film Le Reflux—to
show that. He seeks a Tahitian woman asking her about their son. She says
she doesn’t know where he is, and Louis tells her if the son shows up, she
knows where Louis can be found. This leads to a rare comedic scene as a
“casting call” is held for young men to play Louis’s mixed-race son.
Somehow life for which Louis had such an appetite has lost its flavor in
this tropical paradise. There is a shocking scene—or perhaps merely a very
unsettling one that I had somehow anticipated—near the film’s end. The film
will definitely frustrate viewers used to straight-forward cinematic
storytelling, but the film is powerful and will keep churning inside
filmgoers’ heads long after the closing credits. If you are up for a
challenging film, The Intruder will deliver a rich and flavorful
experience.
C.S.A: THE CONFEDERATE STATES OF AMERICA
Written and directed by Kevin Willmott; director of photography, Matthew
Jacobson
With: Evamarii Johnson, Rupert Pate, Larry J. Peterson, and Charles Frank.
This movie is unrated. Running time: 89 minutes
½
This film envisions a world that might have been had something else happened
in history instead of what actually did happen. These are called alternative
histories and can result in very interesting reimaginings of the world.
C.S.A envisions what might have emerged had the South, the Confederate
States of America, prevailed over the North in our own War Between the
States. Kevin Willmott’s film portrays a world where the Confederacy not
only establishes its independence and sovereignty from the Union but also
where the Confederacy conquers the Union. Whereas the United States leading
up to the War Between the States needed to maintain a fragile balance
between slave states and free states, slavery becomes the way of life
throughout the country.
The vehicle for telling this story is a television documentary made for the
BBS (British Broadcasting System, a fictionalized version of the BBC). Those
desiring a serious look at an alternative history will be disappointed. The
film clearly has its tongue deeply embedded in its cheek. There is recreated
film footage showing a buffoonish Abraham Lincoln being apprehended by
Confederates. There are segments that show an older Abraham and a fugitive
Harriet Tubman. Just as Canada became the refuge of Revolutionary War’s
Tories, so too does Canada serve as the refuge for Northerners fleeing the
Confederacy. We are introduced to the Confederacy’s dynastic first family,
the Fauntroys. There are reenvisionings of how a Confederate States of
America may have developed differently and responded to historical events
differently. None of these are really particularly creative or thought
provoking though they may be quite amusing. To that end, the film does spend
some time on a fictitious romanticization of the North’s “Lost Cause,” just
as America has spent much of the last 140 years romanticizing the
Confederacy’s “Lost Cause.” It is from this part of the film that my
personal highlight for the entire film comes. It is the alternative Gone
with the Wind entitled Northern Wind. This was simply so bad, it
was terrific.
However, the real kick in this film comes from the ads placed in the
documentary’s television broadcast. Much of this is cringe-inducing as we
see ads for a home-shopping network selling slaves, a slave restraint gadget
called “The Shackle,” a promo for a police reality show devoted to rounding
up runaway slaves, and, finally, products with openly racist names like
“Coon Chicken Restaurants” and “Niggerhair.” Though these ads break up the
flow of the faux documentary’s narrative, the film’s credits will reveal
that these product names come directly from our own history—where the
supposedly enlightened free states won. Ultimately, this film is a somewhat
crude and amateurish endeavor that despite its complete lack of polish does
manage to be intermittently amusing and thought provoking.
FRIENDS WITH MONEY
Written and directed by Nicole Holofcener; director of photography, Terry
Stacey; edited by Robert Frazen; music by Craig Richey and Rickie Lee Jones
With: Catherine Keener, Jennifer Aniston, Frances McDormand, Joan Cusack,
Simon McBurney, Jason Isaacs, Scott Caan, Greg Germann, Ty Burrell, and Bob
Stephenson. Rated R. Running time: 90 minutes

Although I go to a lot of films, I—unlike many professional film critics—get
to choose which films I see. This means that I generally see films that I
have some expectation of being interested in and liking. This means that I
generally don’t see many films that serve as fodder for a “10 Worst Films
List.” Then sometimes there’s a Friends With Money. This film
features four talented actresses. Jennifer Aniston is Olivia, a one-time
teacher who now runs her own business cleaning other people’s homes. She
doesn’t have much money but does have friends who do. They are Jane (Frances
McDormand), Christine (Catherine Keener), and Franny (Joan Cusack). They
also have husbands Aaron (Simon McBurney), David (Jason Isaacs), and Matt
(Greg Germann), respectively. There’s no explanation for why hand-to-mouth
Olivia ever became friends with her very wealthy and self-indulgent friends.
These folks embody most of the least attractive words that begin with
“self”—like self-centered, self-deluded, self-involved, selfish. Olivia
seems to be a basically a decent young woman if you can overlook that she
has a serious marijuana habit, allows herself to be shamelessly exploited by
her customer Marty (Bob Stephenson), and then even more egregiously by her
boyfriend Mike (Scott Caan), and then obsessively stalks her married
ex-lover. In this odious ensemble, Simon McBurney’s Aaron is the most decent
and sensitive character. He, naturally, is constantly suspected of being
gay. His hetero cred is done no favors by sex-averse wife Jane and then his
new friendship with the like-minded, same-named Aaron (Ty Burrell). As if
forcing us to spend time with loathsome companions were not bad enough, the
film unfolds in ways that are very predictable. So there is a happy ending
of sorts, but by then one has experienced eighty plus minutes of the
cinematic equivalent of fingernails scraping on a chalkboard. I would
strongly recommend checking out director Nicole Holofcener’s Walking and
Talking (1996) and Lovely & Amazing (2001), instead.
THANK YOU FOR SMOKING
Directed by Jason Reitman; written by Mr. Reitman, based on the novel by
Christopher Buckley; director of photography, James Whitaker; edited by Dana
E. Glauberman; music by Rolfe Kent
With: Aaron Eckhart, Maria Bello, Cameron Bright, Adam Brody, Sam Elliott,
Katie Holmes, David Koechner, Rob Lowe, William H. Macy, J. K. Simmons, and
Robert Duvall. Rated R. Running time: 92 minutes

½
I wasn’t sure I wanted to see this film. As a nonsmoker and a small cog in
the apparatus for providing health care services, I certainly do not
encourage smoking. Aaron Eckhart’s shameless shill for Big Tobacco—the
poster boys for corporate bad citizenship—was hardly a character—as
portrayed in the film’s trailer—with whom I looked forward to spending
ninety-two minutes. The film, however, is thoroughly engaging and very
funny. Eckhart’s Nick Naylor isn’t quite as shameless as he first seems. He
dances the rhetorical fine line trying to never be on the wrong side of an
argument. Although used to confronting hostile audiences, he is daunted by
an audience of one—his son Joey (Cameron Bright). The film has colorful
characters like the tobacco warlord The Captain (Robert Duvall), the head of
the Tobacco Institute Budd Rohrabacher (J. K. Simmons), the dying cigarette
advertising icon Lorne Lutch (Sam Elliott), and the savvy product-promoting
film producer Jeff Megall (Rob Lowe). There are also Naylor’s fellow MOD
(merchants of death) Squad members Polly Bailey (Maria Bello) and Bobby Jay
Bliss (David Koechner). Their arguments about which of their clients’
products (alcohol, tobacco, or firearms) are most dangerous to society are
quite sardonic. The film works as it shows how this man maintains his
integrity and in the process teaches some interesting lessons. It is
entertaining satire and thought provoking. Acknowledging that many products
have assorted pluses and minuses, it raises lots of questions. Is there a
moral aspect to what we do to earn a living? How much influence is wielded
by lobbyists? How much should government do to protect us? Should it protect
us from ourselves? How should personal, corporate, and government
responsibility be balanced? Are their implications for other types of goods
and services? Gambling? Drugs? Prostitution? Is a prostitute an
entrepreneur, a cynical sex merchant, or a victim? These may not immediately
spring to mind, but Jason Reitman’s film of Christopher Buckley’s book has a
way of burrowing into one’s mind and making one think long after the
laughter has fallen silent.

|
| |
| |
|
The current
Journal in print is
Winter |
|
2008 Wolf Moon Desk Calendar
We are pleased to announce that we have put together another snappy desk calendar
featuring work by Maine photographer Clif Graves.

5 1/2" x 5"
2008 Wolf Moon Calendar just
$10.00 each
More Info |
|
Some of the fine
stores
where you can find
Wolf Moon JOURNAL
More Info |
|
Wolf Moon
Photo Note Cards

More Info
|
|
|
|