|
| |
WHAT NOW?
By Denny Harnish
Like other progressives I was shocked and saddened by the 2004 election that
increased Republican control of the Senate and the House and retained their
control of the White House. In January I started to write an article
suggesting ways for us to fight back, but I didn’t really know what to say.
Fortunately, no one pays me to scribble my thoughts on paper, and so I had no
deadline to meet. Therefore, I had more time to consider the matter. This is
the result.
First, we should not think that the country has taken a strong turn to the
right or that most states are now red states in which Democrats cannot be
elected. Most Americans strongly resist ideologies other than the American
bred philosophy of pragmatism. This is the silent majority that is fought
over by the right and the left. From the 1930s through the 1970s, the
Democrats won the hearts, or at least the votes, of the silent majority. Since
then, the Republicans have shown greater appeal.
Although this great middle of the electorate is not very sophisticated in
terms of economic, legal, or political niceties and can be misled into
supporting programs such as tax cuts for the rich or wars of aggression that
are against its interests, these folks have a deep understanding of human
nature. Further, they examine the claims of the parties in view of what they
know about the way the world works. As the conservative columnist David
Brooks recently said, people join movements “because they think that
movement’s views about human nature and society are true.”
For a long time, going back perhaps to the days of Ronald Regan, the right
has held and expressed a consistent position that the chief motivator of
human conduct is enlightened self-interest (read “greed”). The right insists
that communism fell because it failed to account for this powerful
motivator. Domestically, they oppose any and all governmental programs that
might interfere with the free market and damper competition because they
believe that competition is the true nature of society. On the world stage
this philosophy suggests that the United States should ruthlessly pursue its
national interests and only join with other nations when that would promote
America’s interest.
The right also seems to think that human beings need strong threats in order
to behave well, whether it be the death penalty as a deterrent to crime, a
vast nuclear arsenal as the foundation of a robust foreign policy, or the
threat of hell to induce moral behavior. Of course, there is some truth in
these views, and the voters know it, but I think that they also know that
human nature is far more complex and better than these views would suggest.
At a gut level, people know that unbridled capitalism has no heart and that
it produces at least as many losers as winners. That’s why we all love to
see Scrooge squirm during A Christmas Carol and to see CEOs dragged
off to prison in handcuffs. Also, we know that America’s best days occur
when it is generous, kind, and inclusive. That’s why Americans still take
pride in the Marshall Plan but not in how Japanese Americans were treated
during WWII. In short, the people know that the Republican’s view of human
nature is at best not complete. Thus, there is an opportunity for Democrats
to take back the high ground in the human nature debate, particularly
because most Americans already agree with core Democratic views.
We Democrats should affirm at every opportunity our belief that each human
life is precious—not just at conception but always—and that this value is
completely divorced from the value of the person as an economic unit. This
belief leads naturally to our support for programs that provide quality
affordable health care, education, and occupational opportunities to all our
people and that protect the most vulnerable members of society. We also need
to reiterate our belief that cooperation is as fundamental to human nature
as competition and that people are capable of cooperative conduct even if
they do not face the threat of the electric chair, hell, or nuclear war.
This belief leads naturally to our abhorrence of the death penalty and of
war as a means of diplomacy as well as our willingness to join with other
countries to fight international threats such as global warming and the
depletion of the world’s fisheries.
We need to remind people that capitalism, like fire, is useful so long as we
keep it in its place; that wise people do not build fires on their living
room floors; and that wise societies adopt and enforce appropriate health
safety and environmental regulations and require a fair distribution of
wealth. We need to remind the people of our philosophy at every chance and
to tie it into our discussions of policy.
The Democrats’ views on cooperation and inclusiveness are increasingly
supported by scientific research into primate behavior. Even more
importantly, the virtue of cooperation and inclusiveness has been understood
by the average guy at a gut level for thousands of years. Author Thomas
Cahill pointed out in a recent New York Times editorial that the
early Christian church, a church that flowered in a ruthless, capitalistic,
superpower that suppressed woman and most of the rest of its population
(sound familiar?), called itself by the Greek word “ekklesia,” the word used
by the Athenians for their wide open assembly, the world’s first
participatory democracy. In using this word, Mr. Cahill opined, the early
Christians meant to emphasize that all were equal children of God. He quoted
St. Paul as repeatedly saying, “There is no longer Jew or Greek, slave or
free, male or female, for all are one in Christ Jesus.” Based upon similar
views of human nature, Christians, and all other thinking and loving people,
should be the deep allies of progressives. Let us remind them of “the
better angels of their nature” to use Lincoln’s phrase. Let us convince
them that we Democrats care about humans not just in the abstract but as
individuals and not just when they are born but throughout their lives. Let
our party be an “ekklesia.” If we do, then the elections will take care of
themselves.

|
| |
|
|
|
2008 Wolf Moon Desk Calendar
We are pleased to announce that we have put together another snappy desk calendar
featuring work by Maine photographer Clif Graves.

5 1/2" x 5"
2008 Wolf Moon Calendar just
$10.00 each
More Info |
|
Some of the fine
stores
where you can find
Wolf Moon JOURNAL
More Info |
|
Wolf Moon
Photo Note Cards

More Info
|
|
|
|